Keywords:Abraham Shurim; Canadian Council for Refugees; Canadian Jewish Congress; careers; Citizenship Council; English language; family background; family history; French language; Histadrut; immigrants; immigration advocacy; immigration law; Jewish Immigrant Aid Services; JIAS; Joseph Cage; Labor Zionism; Labor Zionists; language courses; Moroccans; National Committee on Yiddish; political advocacy; professions; Russians; social workers; Yiddish education; Yiddish language; Yiddish lessons; Yiddishists
JORDAN KUTZIK:I'm at the Jewish Public Library of Montreal with Rivka Augenfeld
and the date is July 11th, 2012 and we're going to record an oral historyinterview. Do I have your permission to continue?
RIVKA AUGENFELD: Yes.
JK:Okay, so I wanted to start off with your family history and your grandparents
and what they did and what you know about them from growing up.
RA:Well, my parents came from two very different backgrounds. Very Jewish, but
very different. My father, who passed away in 2004 at the age of ninety-one, wasfrom Warsaw, which was always Poland, the heart of Poland, and he was from a 1:00Hasidic family, one of four children, the youngest of four. No, the youngest sonof four children. Younger than him was a sister. His father was a Radzyminerkhosid [Hasid], but not a kind of fanatical kind of khosid, but followed theRadzyminer Rebbe in kind of a mild way. His father was very working class. Hedid whatever he could to make a living. My favorite of my grandfather's manyoccupations was that he made and sold flypaper, something that's gone out of thepopular culture. But he did a lot of other things and took care of his family.His wife, Rivka, who I'm named for, was at home, and from what my father alwaystold us and what his older brother, Abba Igelfeld, who I think is well-known tothe Center, told us they were a very loving couple, very respectful of each 2:00other. My grandfather really respected his wife and very much treated her withlove and respect, which I think was very important in how they grew up and inhow they saw relationships between men and women, even though they went off invery different directions. The oldest brother, Nathan Mussen, who probablystayed in school the longest, was in the yeshiva but was actually running offsomewhere and changing his clothes and going, doing things, but it took him along time to tell his family that he had broken away from religious life. Abba,who was the next one, also broke away at -- probably late teens, but also tookhim a while to tell his parents. And my father, at age fourteen, Dovid, wantedto go to a trade school but asked his father if he could go, promised him he 3:00would respect the Sabbath and he would do everything, but his father refused.His father wanted him to go to a yeshiva. And so, my father stopped, quitschool, and went off to work. So, he went off to work at age fourteen and becamea textile worker and -- as did his two older brothers -- also worked in textilefactories. But factories, of course -- it's a relative term. Some of themprobably looked like what factory would look like and others were more likesweatshops in somebody's house. And my dad -- the union at that time was a verymilitant union, the textile workers' union. So, of course, my father got caughtup in politics and very left-wing politics and, after a series of things,eventually joined the Bund with a group. And my father was very much influencedat the time by Isaac Deutscher, who was a very well-known theoretician andleader and ended up joining the Bund in a very thought-out way. But in his very 4:00young years, because he had been what was perceived to be a communist, this cameback to haunt him later on. Not a communist, but -- he was never really aTrotskyist but the communists branded him a Trotskyist, which was the worstthing you could be in the Soviet Union. So, if I skip forward just for a momentto say that during the Second World War, this label which was attached to myfather put him at great risk. It was enough that Bundists were already on a hitlist for the lot of -- for communists -- Trotskyists were even more so. So, myfather spent the whole war with a pseudonym, which was to protect him not fromthe Germans but from the Soviets. And he always said, "The Germans, it wasn'tpersonal. They wanted to kill all the Jews. But with the Russians, they had myname on a list." And so, it was very -- well, sad isn't the right word. It wasjust incredibly ironic and ridiculous. Of course, he wasn't the only one, but itwas something that affected him. And that name, Kuzko, which was my father's 5:00pseudonym during the war -- my mother put on his gravestone because it's thename that saved him. So, back to the beginning, my father -- in those days,between the unions and the political parties, there was a huge political andgeneral education that they gave to their members and which is very differentthan what they found here. It's interesting 'cause immigrants come to Americaand there's a perception of what do they know, they're hicks, they're grine,m'darfn zey oyslernen [Greenhorns, we have to teach them] but, in fact, theyfound the unions here woefully behind the unions that they had known in Warsaw,and Warsaw was no Hicksville. Warsaw was a big city and a very sophisticatedcity. So, he grew up in that context of living at home, bringing his pay home tohis mother, but for many years not speaking with his father -- even though hisfather never threw him out, he never disowned him, he never -- but his fatherdidn't speak to him and years later -- again, this was -- I find this aninteresting story about my grandfather -- what he said was -- probably not 6:00directly to my father but to somebody -- that his understanding of when you leftreligion, when you stopped believing, that you became hefker, that you becameamoral, that you became completely a rogue kind of person. And in observing,though, the behavior of his sons and their whole circle, he realized that thesewere not hefker people. They were people with great morality, with ethics whowere really working for -- in their own way for a better world. So, I find this,again, a very interesting, thoughtful person that was this grandfather that Inever knew whose name was Khaskl, Khaskl. And my cousin who lives in Toronto isnamed after him. So, that was the background: very intense, Warsaw Jewish. Myfather lived on Franciszkańska Street in Warsaw in that very intense Jewishneighborhood and was very involved, as I said. Worked very hard and then did a 7:00lot of union work and a lot of political work and -- along with that whole storyof the youth of that time. So, in the '30s, he was working -- he started working-- see, my father was born in 1913, so in the late '20s, he was already working.He lived through the Depression. And, of course, he was born right in the middleof the First World War. And I think that the economic -- and the deprivations ofthat time and the hunger and everything probably also had an impact on him andhis brothers, as many other people, because they were malnourished during thoseyears. And I think that had kind of these consequences which only sort of showedup much, much later. So, yeah, so that was my father during -- at the beginningof the war, and in September '39, along with many other people, they startedwalking east after the first bombs started falling. They left behind -- I think, 8:00from what I gather -- and unfortunately, my father and his brother, Abba, toldmany, many stories and we never sat down and recorded them all properly, which Iregret 'cause they weren't only of interest to the family. They were of generalinterest, I think, because they were so reflective and so thoughtful and theyhad such interesting sort of hindsight and ideas about what had happened. And Ithink when they left, nobody had any idea what was going to happen. I don'tthink they thought they were leaving for that long. I don't know if they wouldhave left their parents the way they did if they had known that. But I think thebiggest regret that they had was that they left their sister, Sarah, behind,because -- since the three brothers left survived and the sister perished. Hardto know where, but for the Warsaw Jews, if they didn't die in the ghetto, thenthey died in Treblinka. That seems to be -- I mean, where else? That's where 9:00people were sent. But then, as they moved east, my father's brothers, who werealready married by then -- they were older and they had wives, very young andvery beautiful wives -- went to Russia, to the Soviet Union, and ended up inTajikistan and Kazakhstan and all these places. My father couldn't go to theSoviet Union; it was just too dangerous for him. And so, he ended up first inVilna where many of those very political people went initially. He then went toKovno in Lithuania because initially in the war, the Soviets gave Vilna and allthose -- they gave them to the Lithuanians for a while and then they took itback. But I always had this idea what it's like to wake up one morning and theborder has moved. You're in the same place. And to me, Vilna, where my motherwas born -- I'm just jumping a bit now because it was -- my mother was born in1923 and she was born in Poland and the first time I thought of going to Vilna, 10:00to me, Vilna is in Poland, in that mythical place. And then, I thought -- thiswas in the early '80s and I said, Wait a minute, Vilna is in Lithuania andLithuania's in the Soviet Union and now I have to get a Soviet visa. But I don'twant to go there. I don't want to go to the Soviet Union. I want to go to Vilna.So, it's all those things we live with, things that haunt us when we live with ahistory that we never -- that it's not our story, but it's somehow the story wecarry and the place that we've never been to that is more powerful sometimesthan the place that we are. So, my dad ended up there in Vilna, then he went toKovno. In Kovno, there was a whole group of people from various politicalpersuasions, but including a group, Bundists, who were trying to get visas fromthe Japanese consul, Sugihara, who did give a lot of visas. And there were anumber of people who got out, including some very good friends of my parents whoended up here in Montreal. But they gave precedence to people with children. And 11:00somebody who was very well-known here in Montreal, Arthur Lermer, who was one ofthe leaders of the Bund here and a professor of economics at Concordia. They gotout 'cause they had an infant in their arms, their son Zohelel, George, who wasborn just before everything started. And so, they gave precedence to people withchildren. They got out. But in order to use the visa, you needed the Soviettransit visa and in order to get the Soviet transit visa, there was anotheradventure. You always had to have the end destination and work your way backwith all the transit visas. I only understood all this later when I got involvedin immigration and refugee matters. So, my father never got that transit visa.So, he ended up, through a series of place -- going back to Vilna. He was in anumber of other places. He was in Kovel. He witnessed some of the Einsatzgruppenoperations. But he went back to Vilna, and he was in Vilna when the Jews were 12:00forced into the ghetto, which was a very brutal operation. But because he didn'thave any family, he wasn't from Vilna, he didn't have any family, I understandfrom him but from other people, as well, that he was able to help other peoplebecause he didn't have a lot of things to liquidate. He didn't have a house toleave. My mother, on the other hand, who is from Vilna and was ten yearsyounger, so was eighteen that day when -- my mother talks about how horriblethat was because you were given very little time. You were told you could takewhatever you can carry and you cannot go back. Once you stepped out of the door,you can't go back. And, in fact, they did -- there was something that theywanted to get and they were not allowed to go back in. And before they left,what they did was they hid a whole bunch of photographs. And after the warended, my mother went back to that house. And, of course, people were verysuspicious 'cause they thought people wanted their houses back. And she was 13:00trying to tell them, "I just want these pictures," and they wouldn't even talkto her, they wouldn't let her into the house, so she never did get back thepictures. It's a very poignant story. But my mother is -- so, that was my dad,up to the war. And during the war -- and in the ghetto, of course, quicklyjoined up with his fellow Bundists and then there was -- all the story has beendocumented and told, so I'm not really going to go into the details of theFareynikte Partizaner Organizatsye that was formed in Vilna, the partisanorganization. And my father became a member through his Bund affiliation. Andthen, he was in the first group that -- and that story, it's told in thepartisan -- well, my father was in the first group of partisans that went outinto the forest and there was a last-minute change of orders. They were supposedto have gone to Rudnitsky, which is closer. They ended up in Narach, which is 14:00now in Belarus. And when I went to Vilna, I wanted to go there. They said, Youare not going to Belarus. Nobody was gonna let me go there because it's such acreepy place. But I did go to Rudnitsky where everything -- and I have a lot ofpictures of what that all looked like. So, that was them up to the war. Andthen, my mother, who was born in Vilna to parents who were from Vilna, very much-- my mother was, in part, in the middle of that incredible flowering of Yiddishsecular culture that was Vilna. And I think it's very much documented in thatfilm "The World Was Ours," I think, Mira Jedwabnik's film. And so, her fatherwas a Yiddish teacher, had gone to the teachers' seminary. And my parents, mygrandparents were young people when the war started. They were born in 1895. So,in the early '20s, they were young. They were educated still under the Russian 15:00system 'cause Vilna was in Russia -- and spoke Russian beautifully and then hadto requalify. When Poland took over, Vilna had to requalify professionally inPolish. So, it was easier for some people than others. But they lived inYiddish. They really lived in Yiddish. My grandmother, who had been a teacher --then my mother was born and it's ironic, when my mother was already -- verysmall child, my grandmother, her mother, went back to school and went to nursingschool and became a nurse. And it's these very modern people, and that's why italways was kind of a point of contention, of pain to come here and be treatedlike these griner because they were so progressive and so modern. And when onelooks at the curriculum of the schools, of the Jewish schools, the modernschools at that time and the educational projet [French: project], if you will, 16:00of what they were trying to do, it was so much more modern than anything thatwas going on here, where we were -- we had this, what do you call it,confessional public school system where you had Protestant schools and Catholicschools but they were public and not in any way as progressive a curriculum. So,my mother was raised in that school. I think she's told the story, too, and shewent to the Realgymnasium, which was like the -- in terms of -- it wasn't rich,they didn't have any money, but they sure were fancy in terms of theireducational aspirations and in terms of their ideals and in terms of what theywere trying to accomplish. And I think they turned out the most astonishinglywell-educated people because later on, when I met a lot of the people who hadbeen her classmates just before or after her -- and you look at the level ofeducation they managed to acquire just from that Realgymnasium without everhaving gone on to do any more studies, 'cause for many of them, the war 17:00interrupted it -- others did go on and became -- and professors, the Kahn familyand other families. There were all kinds of families that then -- where peopledid manage to go on and acquire more education. But just at that level of havingfinished the gymnasium, what they knew, their approach, their capacity to doindependent research, to write in a coherent way -- when I look at my mother'swriting skills, they're much better than mine. (phone rings) Oh, shit. Can youstop it? Sorry, I thought I had turned it off. I'm very sorry. I thought I hadturned it off. Sorry! I was sure I had turned it off. Okay. All right, we back up?
JK:Sorry.
RA:Where should I start again?
JK:The [Real-gymnasia] --
RA:Yeah, so anyway, so, yeah. So, my mother, over the years, prepared a lot of
texts, prepared a lot of talks. But she wasn't the spontaneous sort. She neededto write everything down. But it was beautifully written. There is nothing extrain any of my mother's texts. There's no fluff. My dad, on the other hand, wasmuch better at the spontaneous intervention. He was much better without ascript. He was very good -- and I think I'm probably more like him in meetings-- of sort of thinking, of intervening at just the right time, thinking -- being 18:00quick on his feet in response and in making -- and probably from all those yearsof political activity and agitation. So, my mother grew up in that atmosphere.Her father, as I said, he was a teacher. He was then a school principal andduring the summer, he was also director of a camp for a summer. He worked veryhard. I think the director of camp part was -- it was something that was verymuch within his calling, but it was also very difficult. And so, I think heworked very, very hard. And my understanding is that he suffered from migraines,as well. But he had to earn as much money as he could because being a Jewish --a Yiddish teacher was not a way to make any money and they were actually verypoor. And it took me a while -- it was only when I got older that my motheractually started talking -- she never went on about that when I was younger, butit was later on that I started to realize to what extent -- how tight money wasand how every little expense had to be thought through. And it was only once my 19:00grandmother started going to work and was being a nurse and brought in a littleextra money that things eased up a bit. But it was very difficult and, ofcourse, it was the Depression. And my mother was born in 1923, so was just ayoung girl during the Depression. But from what I also understand and from otherpeople, it's not just my mother's story. My grandfather was a really belovedteacher. He was strict but he was kind and he was fair and he was very smart.And he was part of that cohort of people who were trying to build this society.And my grandmother, who -- again, I don't have one single picture of her --appears, from all accounts, to have been also a very exceptional woman whofought for her education, who, when she was still in high school, when -- fought 20:00to finish her high school because her father thought it was enough for a girland didn't want to spend the money. My grandmother went off to work, saved hermoney, went to schoolmates' -- her friends' house every evening to catch up onthe day's schooling and then went back, passed her exam, and continued schooland finished her high school. So, it's that determination. It's theintelligence, but the determination and the drive as a young woman to continueand to be educated that I think is so admirable. And that's the atmosphere mymother grew up in. I think that whole Vilna thing has been well-documented andthere are people who have written about it a lot. So, I don't think I need totell you that much. But she was really in the heart of it. And when she talksabout her school and all the things they did, studying -- and because theystudied science and math and geography in Yiddish, and history, they had acomplete command of the language. Their Yiddish was so rich because they did 21:00everything in Yiddish, in addition to -- I mean, they did Polish language andliterature and history, but their life was in Yiddish. And it was this complete-- and with a great emphasis on excellence and on language so that it wasn'tanything went. And if I can be allowed a little (UNCLEAR), it wasn't like theYeshivish that one hears now. That would not have been tolerated. It wasn't likethe kind of Yiddish I hear on the street in Montreal in certain areas whereanything goes. It was really that kind of determination to create a languagethat was gonna be at the height of any other language. And she went to summercamp and she went -- I think the highlight was the Bund camp in 1937 tocelebrate the fortieth anniversary of the Bund. There was a three-city camp thatwas organized: Warsaw, Łódź, and Vilna. But my mother always said -- luckily, 22:00the camp took place -- (coughs) excuse me -- right near Vilna, because if it hadbeen near Warsaw or near Łódź, she might not have been able to go becausethey wouldn't have been able to afford the expense of just the trip. So, that'show tight things were. But they did in the summer and my mother says the lastsummer just before the war started when the clouds were already out there, theyspent some time at a summer house, in a datshe [summer cottage], and had alittle rest. And ironically, in 1939, when the Soviets took over Vilna, theyclosed some of the Jewish schools but -- and my grandfather was no longerallowed to be a principal but he did start getting paid at a higher rate.Somehow, it became more state controlled, so for the first time he got moremoney, which is the big irony of that whole thing, is that right before the end,he got more money than he had ever earned before. But Vilna continued, more or 23:00less -- and when the Germans came in briefly and then gave it over to theSoviets, my mother was sixteen, she was still in school. She managed to -- theykept going to school. Her school stayed open, the Realgymnasium stayed open.There were people who came into that school from other schools that had beenclosed and especially some of the girls that came in at that time became mymother's very, very close friends and remained friends for a very long time.They were more from Hashomer Hatzair and they were from the more -- the Zionistleft-wing organizations came in, and they became very close at that time. Andthere was an infusion of all these -- and so, when -- and, again, the verypoignant story is that in June of 1941, they wrote their last exam on Saturdaymorning. Saturday morning, I want everyone to remember. They went to school and 24:00they wrote exams. And that was the last one and then they were, as anyfinissant, graduates, about-to-be graduating high school, despite everythingthat was going on, they were very excited, they ran around, they bought flowersand they got ice cream and were having a party. And the next day, on the Sundayevening, was supposed to be the graduation. And in the morning, my mother waswashing her hair and then the bombs started falling and then the Germansattacked. So, my mother never -- I get very choked up when I tell the storybecause (tears up) think about it, it's like one day you're in your life and thenext day -- and this happens over and over again in other stories and in otherplaces. So, I remember when I was around that age, when I was sixteen, eighteen,trying to imagine being there and doing that. And it was very powerful as a kindof -- trying to imagine what would I have done and how would I have been and howwould I have reacted to all this stuff? But yeah, she never went to her highschool graduation. So, formally, she never got her high school diploma. But to 25:00all intents and purposes, there's nothing, there's no piece of paper that saidshe graduated from the Realgymnasium. And then, of course, everything wentdownhill very, very quickly. They went into the ghetto. My mother, she went, shegot a job at the kinderheym, at the orphanage, which -- a very brutal place. Shetells that story in a publication and it was very complicated with getting theproper -- what were called the "shaynen" -- if you did have a permit, if youdidn't have a permit, if you were considered work-worthy or not. So, her fatherhad one. The people got kind of attached to different families, that wholestory, it's very complex. But then, her father was sent off to some camp inEstonia. And my mother had, in the meantime, through her Bund connectionsbecause my mother had been a member of the SKIF and then Tsukunft as a young 26:00person. I don't even know if she got to the Tsukunft, 'cause she was still SKIFage. I can't remember exactly when you -- this was the Bund youth movement, soyou could become a member of the Tsukunft, which was the -- I think fromeighteen on or something. And she became a member of the FPO, as well. Shealways tells the story of how the person who kind of took her oath was cryingbecause he said, Look at these beautiful young women, and this is what we haveto do now with them, is make them into fighters. So, it was that kind ofpoignancy, also, because all these people knew each other and very few of themhad any previous kind of fighting experience or military background. So, shebecame a member of the FPO, but she and my father never really met properly, saweach other. And years and years and years later, I interviewed my parents about 27:00this because I realized that I had never heard the story in a completechronological sequence from A to the end because I always heard bits of thestory. And I had an opportunity at one point to tell their story on a Frenchradio program. So, I went and got their permission and I interviewed them to getthe chronology straight. So, I asked them what I had never asked them before,which was, When did you first notice each other, when did you see each other?And for my father, it was much earlier than her because he -- there was somemeeting of the Bund part of the FPO. There was somebody's room in the ghetto andhe said he was there. My father, because of that whole Soviet business, wastrying to look as old as possible. He had a droopy mustache and he was clumpingaround and he had his hair shaved off and he -- but my mother walked in and shewas really a very beautiful young woman with two long black braids. And he just,poof, saw her and she didn't really notice -- she saw him, but she didn't notice 28:00him. But he took note of her in a very powerful way. But then, later on, whenthey met in the forest, they connected. And they were lucky because people gottogether during hard times for all kinds of reasons and not all the matches wereso made in heaven. But my parents were lucky because it was a real love story.And so, in the middle of all of that stuff that was going on, they met and theyconnected. And we always celebrated their anniversary as the 1st of January,1944. And it's not the day they got married. It's the day that they promisedeach other that if they survived, just sitting in the forest there in the middleof January, promised each other that if they survived, they would stay together.So, that was the date of the anniversary. And then, they were liberated early,in the summer of '44. Came back to Vilna. Had to be very careful because the 29:00Soviets were in control and as soon as they were able to and as soon as the warwas sort of over, they exited, went to Poland, and then started looking at whereto go, 'cause there was that whole debate that went on at the time aboutstaying, going, what to do? Rebuild, leave? And some people wanted to stay, notjust the communists but some of the Bundists, as well, thought -- and I thinksome people were still talking about staying until the Kielce Pogrom happened.And once that happened, they said, That's it, finished, we're leaving. So, therewere people who stayed, but the bulk of people, some of whom had still beenhesitating, decided this was time to go. And then, what happened was that they-- my parents had never been Zionists and they didn't want to go to Palestine,but the only people that were organizing anything -- and they had a lot offriends in that group, like really very high-up -- was the Breichah, which werethe Zionists who were organizing the movement to Palestine, the illegalmovement. So, my parents joined up there. And so, to get out of Poland, theywent through Hungary and through, I think, through Czechoslovakia, through 30:00Austria. And then, they were in a convoy which was supposed to cross themountains into Italy. And then, my understanding of this is that the convoy gotstuck. And somehow, several trucks just before them, there was -- it sort ofhalted. And then, they couldn't -- whatever had been set up for them to passwasn't working anymore. And so, they went back to Austria. And then, they sortof caught their breath and then they thought about what they wanted to do andthen they realized, or rather decided, they didn't actually want to go toPalestine, that there were other alternatives, perhaps. So, they stayed inAustria. They were in Graz, which was in the British zone, and that's where Iwas born in September '46. And then, there was that whole period of trying tofind a place to go. And I think Austria was -- but it was a little kind of a 31:00buffer moment for them because despite the fact that they were homeless and theyhad lost so much, they had a moment where they could sort of catch their breath.And my mother, of course, being my mother, immediately went and became a memberof the library and started reading in German. During the war, she read inRussian. My mother was always a member of a library. And my father startedlooking around started to try to figure out how to make a living and talking toother people. And I think what's important, I think, are people were very muchorganized around their previous affiliations, whether it was -- and that's howpeople vouched for each other, 'cause when I got involved in immigration andrefugee stuff and the whole question of ID comes up now. "How do we know you arewho you say you are?" Blah blah blah. And so, I asked my father, I said, "Howdid people establish their identifies? Everything had been destroyed." And hesaid, "Well, people vouched for each other." There was a system of, let's say,affidavits. I will say that I knew you because -- and I had to provide details. 32:00So, we were together in this and this place or in this and this organization andthis is what we did. And so, I would say this is who you are, Jordan, and youwould vouch or vice-ver-- so, there was a whole way, because people did not have-- most of them didn't have the kind of documents we expect people to have now.And all that wouldn't work anymore. That would not work anymore. So, theystarted applying to different countries and then they were -- in Graz, they wereofficially living in a DP camp and unofficially living in a hotel in the city,which I went to see twice. And this whole process of applying to differentplaces began. And then, there was the unpleasant story of the fact that a lot ofthe -- that there was a real, shall we say, interference and intimidation thatwent on from some of the Zionist groups that were discouraging people fromapplying anywhere else. And people don't like to talk about that now, but it's 33:00been corroborated by many people that they sometimes -- in some of the smallerDP camps, they would just come and, if a delegation came from some country to --they would say, Nobody here is interested. Nobody even knew that they had come.And then, eventually, when -- Canada was very late and very slow in gettinginvolved, and that's all been documented in an amazing book called "None Is TooMany," which documents Canada's woeful history before, during, and after thewar. But eventually, what Canada, through a lot of different efforts -- therewere these commissions that came to look for workers. So, they weren't lookingfor Jews, and "Jew" was never mentioned, but they were looking for workers intrades that were in demand: tailors, furriers, and millinery and cap makers.That was the three main groups. And agricultural workers, of course, were big, 34:00but was -- and so, they started going and looking for people. And, of course, myfather was none of the above. He was a textile worker, so you had to becomesomething in demand. So, they all somehow became furriers. And one of -- myclosest friend, who -- we came on the same boat together, her dad was a realfurrier and a very good furrier. So, he was the one -- so, the fur machine wasin my parents' apartment and he was teaching people how -- the rudiments offur-making or -- not fur-making, but the garment-making so that people could goand pass the test, 'cause you had to pass a test. You had to have a medical --you had to pass a literacy test and you had to show that you had some knowledgeof the trade. Now, my mother insists that at the end, my father came clean withthe commission and he said, "Look, I'm not really a furrier but here's what I amand if you let us come to Canada," blah blah blah, and that they somehow gavehim points for his honesty and took him. I don't know exactly how that went, 35:00really, I don't. But that's how people were selected. And the families with thechildren were -- so, my father and my mother and me and my father's olderbrother, Nathan, who had come -- they had reunited, found each other -- myfather's brothers, who had been in the Soviet Union -- long, also, story, howthey found each other and they were all together in Austria. So, we were on oneof the first boats that came. And then, they, in turn, sponsored the otherbrother, Abba, who didn't have a child yet, who had lost a child in Russia butthat came after us. So, there were all these people that came on boats from --landed in Halifax at Pier 21, got on a train and came to Montreal, to Toronto,to other cities. But yeah, I think my parents were fortunate in meeting eachother because other people didn't do as well. Many people did. Some people were 36:00already together before the war. My uncles both had met their wives before, weremarried already. And then, here, they very quickly -- I think from day one, theybecame involved in stuff. They never just sat at home and just did their ownthing. On the cultural level, as my mother always loves to tell the story, howbefore we had an apartment and we were living in this horrible rooming housewhere the landlady didn't like me, she took me in my little stroller and took meoff to the library to become a member of the library. So, I was two. And thiswas 19-- because we came in October of '48, we came to Canada. So, a few dayslater, we were members of the library. And then, there was the Workmen's Circleand the Bund. And those, the Workmen's Circle, they were extraordinarilyimportant in helping people settle. There were the service organizations. There 37:00was Jewish Immigrant Aid Services, which was a kind of a -- it wasn't HIAS, butit was like a sister agency, and other family services and clinics. But thesefraternal organizations were very, very important. And the landsmanshaftn[associations of immigrants originally from the same region] were very, veryimportant and there were a number of very big landsmanshaft here. There was aVarshava Farband, there was a Vilna organization. And other cities, Łódź andothers, they were very, very, very important in helping people. And my dad wasvery involved in, in the Workmen's Circle, very quickly. I look at -- I don'tknow if you know, in 19-- I think it was in '57. In 1957, there was a bigconference of the Bund here in Montreal because -- international conferencebecause of McCarthy stuff. There were people who'd not have been allowed to cometo the US. And so, the conference happened here, so that was -- and they werealready very involved in the organization. My father was always more the 38:00organizer. He was the guy who knew how to organize things and who looked at --and taught me about details are important. And, "Somebody should do something,"that there has to be a designated somebody. He always thought of every littledetail and it's interesting because my father was very, very short. He was a bigguy. I mean, he was short. And so, he thought of things like how tall is thisperson that's gonna be standing at the microphone and do they need a littlestep-up thing so that they can be seen over the podium, not like the famouspicture of Queen Elizabeth where you can't see her over the top of the podium.But yeah, so he thought of things like that and he always made sure everythingwas in place and he taught me that. And he became very involved, also, at thelibrary and was involved, also, in an organization that gave loans to people whocouldn't get loans in the bank. He was very much someone who said you can't just 39:00live on your past glories, 'cause he felt that for a lot of people, lot ofsurvivors, even though, I mean, they had lived through these horrible things,but in some ways it was the highlight of their life and that's the only storythey had to tell. And I was very fortunate that he taught me that if somebodywas not a nice person before the war, the war didn't improve them. (laughs) Ifyou were a person who was just not a kind person or a nice person, that youdidn't suddenly become a noble person because of the war. Of course, you had tobe respected for everything that happened, but it didn't mean that you could beforgiven everything. And not everything was because of the war and you had to bea mensch and behave. And he became very involved in the library. There was anincredible group of people here -- sort of the first -- that generation of -- anumber of them who are incredible autodidacts. I don't know, there hasn't beenanother -- it doesn't exist now, I don't think, as a group. There are 40:00individuals who are autodidacts but that whole group of people who had to go offto work very young but kept learning, kept studying, taught themselveseverything. One of the people who is a really amazing man here in the library,Chaim Spielberg, who came to Canada, also, who spent the war in India. He was aZionist, he was -- but he had -- his Hebrew was impeccable 'cause he went to oneof those Hebrew high schools and became a builder. Build homes and he was aconstruction guy for -- as a living, and then continued studying, got -- wasvery involved with the library. And then, he wrote a book in Hebrew aboutHinduism, which won the J.I. Segal Prize, but which also, years later, we foundout, became a bit of a best-seller in Israel because when Israeli youth startedgoing to India, when that became the thing to do after you finished the army,they were looking for books in Hebrew on Hinduism and his was one of them. So, 41:00he had this kind of second life. But who imagined such a thing, that you becomeproficient enough in a language that's not your daily language to write a bookand make it -- it's just astonishing, that whole group of people, and that theyall hung out here. And so, my father was very involved, the board of directors,and was the president of the board for two years in the '70s. And again, I wouldsay the legacy that he left was, among other things, insisting that that groupof reshaim [Hebrew: rebels, lit. "wicked people"], they were really incrediblepeople, but letting in younger people was not their best strength. And he toldthem, "Look, you have to -- if you want the future of this library to be assuredand if you want this to go on, you have to look at the younger generation, youhave to figure out how to pull them in, you have to make it a welcoming placefor them and," he said, "and you have to get used to the fact that younger 42:00people will be sitting at the table and they will not agree with you. Acondition of their participation is not that they say yes to everything yousay." And his condition for becoming the president of the board was that thenext person after him would be sort of the next generation, and he accomplishedthat. So, he broke that -- for the people in his gang, so to speak, that theyhad to come to terms with allowing people to come into leadership positions. Andafter him, there were a number of people from my generation who came in andbecame leaders in the library. It was really something. And I think he deservesa lot of credit for that. And my mother, she didn't really work outside the homeand she was very involved also here at the library and she, at some point,started being asked to speak. And any time my father had to speak, my motherhelped him write his text. But my parents wrote letters. I remember before, when 43:00they wrote these long letters to all their friends, the picture was my mother issitting and my father is pacing around and speaking and my mother is writing. Hewasn't the one who sat down and actually wrote very much. But if he had to givea talk, they would work on it together. So, there was very much a partnership inthat way, but when mother gave a talk, she would write it all out and it was, asI said, very tight and very -- really, really well-written and always ready aweek ahead of time, (laughs) contrary to me who was never finished until afterthe last minute. So, somewhere, I think, I have to start looking at her filesbecause there are a whole bunch of these texts that she wrote that should becompiled. Some of them are variants of each other because when she spoke atHolocaust -- let's say remembrance events, you don't reinvent everything but shewould adapt it for the occasion. And a number of times, when I heard her speak,she actually said stuff that I had never even heard before. I remember she told 44:00a story to the Reconstructionist synagogue about how, in Vilna, when they cameback in the summer of '44 -- so, there are all these -- all of them, nobody wasreligious, nobody went to shul, nobody prayed. But on Yom Kippur that year in'44, she said they all ended up going to the ruins of the big synagogue in Vilnaand being there on Yom Kippur because it was something that was so overwhelmingand how unbearably sad all of that was. So, there are times -- and she also,very early on, she said -- she talked about how -- to one group, to kids, shewould say, "Now, when some tragedy happens or there's an incident at a school,the first thing they do is bring in the psychologists and the grief counselorsand everybody comes -- and make sure everybody's okay and da-da-da." She said,"When we came, there were no psychologists and no grief counselors," sorry, "and 45:00nobody who thought it was important for us to talk," 'cause that was one of theother things. Now, the Holocaust is everywhere and it's almost, I would say, toomuch. It become-- overwhelming. But everyone forgets that at the time they came,and that whole generation, whether they came to New York or whether they came toother American cities or wherever they went, even -- and particularly in Israel,nobody wanted to hear their story. And they hung together for a long time. Therewere these artificial friendships -- not artificial, but people who would notnormally have been the people you hung out with but you hung out with becausethey understood you, at least, and they were the ones who had lived through thesame thing and people sort of at least -- without having to tell each other,they knew what the other person had gone through. Whereas in the larger society,just starting with the Jewish community, people didn't really want to hear aboutit. It was not a convenient story, there was a lot of misunderstanding. Therewas a lot of guilt, not acknowledge-- and also, it took a long time for this to 46:00become an issue or a commemoration for the whole community. And so, all thoseearly years, before there was a quote-unquote Yom HaShoah, when there was akhurbn [Holocaust] and there were khurbn commemorations, Workmen's Circle andthe Bund, the landsmanshaftn -- but there was no community-wide Yom HaShoahcommemoration for a long time and we remember -- and so, my parents and theircohorts, they celebrated -- commemorated April nineteenth, which was the WarsawGhetto Uprising date for them. That was their date. And then, each landsmanshafthad their own date. For Vilna, it was somewhere between Rosh Hashanah and YomKippur because that was when the ghetto was liquidated. But April nineteenth, sothat was, for me, that was the date. And in early, early days, even when Aprilnineteenth was Pesach the way it was originally they did it, later years, theystarted saying, No, if it's Pesach, we do it a day before, a day after. But 47:00there were times -- I remember still, living in the '60s, when the community,when the other -- the big organizations were -- had other events on Yom HaShoah.They didn't do anything. And so, all of that came much later, I would say, andin the late '70s became a big community hoo-hah thing. So, there are a lot ofpeople who deserve a lot of credit for having kept that issue going and kept italive and emphasized the importance of remembering things before it became acommunity-wide thing. So, that's it. So, they were very much involved here inthe community and my father was a very successful businessman. And I think hispersonality -- it's hard to know what -- had he had -- years later, he would saythat, of course, if he had been able to go to school and do -- I don't know, hewouldn't have been in business, I don't think, although his personality made himvery good in business because he was very good at connecting with people. And my 48:00father's partner, Joseph Glasrat, who -- when he came after the war -- he washis friend from Warsaw. He sent over a couple of knitting machines from --because he ended up in Germany after the war. And then, when he got here, theyopened this little factory and worked very, very hard and the factory grew andgrew and grew. But it got to a certain point and they said, That's it. We'remaking a living. Everything is fine, we're good. And they didn't go crazy andthey didn't try to expand beyond what was wise. But my father was the outsideguy. He was the sales guy. And it was because he was so good at sizing up peopleand establishing individual relationships that even in the early days, when hisEnglish was terrible -- but he managed to connect with people and establishrelationships with people from very fancy companies. I don't -- they're notgonna mean that much to you, but he was dealing with Dominion Textiles, whichwas a huge textile firm here or -- with Stanfield's, which was -- made underwear 49:00in Nova Scotia, which -- that family produced a leader of one of the politicalparties, so -- and he traveled and he talked to all these people and he did verywell, 'cause in his factory, they made knitted materials. They didn't makegarments. So, they were selling this -- they were buying thread and makingmaterial and then selling the material to manufacturers. So, my father would beselling underwear material to Stanfield's to make underwear. So, that kind ofstuff. But for him, the business, it was a way to make a living. It wasn't hisidentity, so to speak. So, that was it. So, that's the kind of house I grew upin. And, of course, I had to do my own thing to rebel and do other things. Andthey managed to make Yiddish the norm. I don't know how they did -- I reallydon't know how they -- contrary to what a lot of other people were able to do,they just made it clear that we were not gonna speak English. And even though my 50:00cousin and I, my younger cousin, eighteen months younger than me, we spokeEnglish to each other and then we would do the switching. And I think that's whyI became very good at code-switching because, A, I discovered many years laterthat I was a linguistic anomaly, quote-unquote. It was a good thing nobody toldme when I was a kid that I switched all the time back and forth from the morestandard Yiddish accent of my mother to the varshever [Warsaw] accent of myfather, back and forth when I spoke to them. So, it was like this -- but I don'tknow and I cannot tell you what I spoke to both of them together. Sometimes, Iwould try to sort of be conscious of it and then I got sort of paralyzed, so Icouldn't do it while I was thinking about it. And my cousin, as well. So, weswitched back and forth, back and forth all the time. And I found out that,eight years later, that children don't usually do that. They don't usually have 51:00two accents. They pick one or the other, usually the mother's. But I didn't haveeither. That's not a universal rule and I know many exceptions. But in school,of course, in yidishe folkshule [Yiddish secular school] that I went to here, wespoke -- it was standard Yiddish that was mostly taught, the accent -- that kindof accent. Not deep Litvak, but my mother didn't speak deep Litvak because shehad gone to school. So, even some other people I met from Vilna had a much moreLitvak accent and the people that came from Kovno had a much more Litvak accent,which I really -- like, the way Sam Kassow speaks when you let him really loose.And there aren't that many people left who speak like that. And I think it'sgreat. But my father also didn't speak deep varshe [Warsaw Yiddish]. He didn'tspeak what they call "ek shmole mile [very specifically Miła]," which is --well, Miła Street, right? There's shmole mile [specifically Miła] and thenthere's ek shmole mile. So, it's like this -- it's an expression that sort of 52:00means the heavy-duty Warsaw, deep Warsaw accent. He didn't speak that eitherbecause it had been leavened a little bit by his time that he spent with allthese Litvakers in here. So, he spoke -- I mean, he had his Warsaw accent, butit wasn't that heavy "yakh." He never said "yakh," my father. He never saidother things. And my uncle, his brother, Abba, who had been, as I said, inWarsaw, had been involved in -- he was a textile worker by day, but he wasinvolved in theater and in literary pursuits by night. And you know him throughhis readings for the Yiddish Talking Books. He was in a group, a theater groupcalled "Orpheus," "Orfeyush," they used to call it. And it took me years, also,to realize that Orfeyush and Orpheus are the same person. So, he was in a lot of 53:00amateur theatrical groups and they, again, were incredibly modern. They followedeverything that was going on in Europe and they did all these modernisticthings. My uncle used to do these -- show us these exercises that they used todo, a German neo-whatchamacallit-ism (sic) or whatever it was. They were righton top of everything. And the best theater groups used to come through and theVilner Trupe, which came from Vilna and was so avant-garde, traveled -- and so,they saw the best of everything. And my uncle, who was -- as I said, spent thewar in the Soviet Union when they were in -- when they all joined up. In the DPcamps, he and a number of other people started a Yiddish theater, which traveledaround the camps. And there are pictures of that and there was a little exhibitthat was done two years ago here in the library of that. And so, when he camehere, of course, again, there was no money to be made in Yiddish anything. So,he worked, also, in a factory, in a textile factory. He worked for my father 54:00more in the office, but he was very, very involved in the Varshava Farband,very, very involved in all the literary activities, did readings, and taught meand my cousins and others -- he was always our coach. He taught us -- he was ourwonderful -- we spent wonderful times with him. So, there were a group of us whowould always be preparing ghetto commemorations and other things. Sad material,but we would have the best time with him because he was very funny. So, we wouldget together with him. We would practice our stuff, but for the rest of thetime, we just listened to stories and had really a wonderful time with him. Hewas -- very, very funny man. And when he retired from his job, he became afull-time volunteer here in the library. And people will still remember him assomebody who was completely autonomous. He did all the Yiddish stuff. He wentaround with his little cart and he sorted books and collected books andcatalogued books and he just loved it. So, he was really here for years, everyday, doing his job and being the kind of volunteer you dream about because he 55:00knew so much. He knew an enormous amount. And people would call him withquestions about literature and all of this stuff. So, until very late, when hewas living in the seniors residence near here. And yeah, my father's -- theother brother, Nathan, was the tragic story because we came to Canada. We werejust getting established and then, in 1952, when he was forty-five years old, hewent in for an operation, which was supposed to be not such a -- but operations,operation. Everyone was very apprehensive, and he had his operation, whichseemed to go okay. And then, I've heard various versions of this but I thinkwhat happened is that there was a blood clot and when he sat up, when they sathim up and started to get him walking, this blood clot sort of shot through hisbody and was almost instant and he died in '52. And it was the huge trauma of 56:00the family, this huge tragedy 'cause, first of all, his son, my cousin, wasfour-and-a-half. And it took me years to understand how terrible this was. Itwas a tragedy for our family, but it was -- in the context of everything, itjust -- beyond -- all the mourning and all the grieving and all the -- it wasjust too much. It was just too much. And they had just this feeling here theywere safe. The three brothers, no matter what had happened, they had come, theywere starting a new life. And then, this brother just dies one day. And it was avery, very -- and for the whole community, it was this huge shocker. There wasmy uncle and there were one or two other people who died very -- relativelyspeaking, very young, and it was just devastating. Hugely devastating for thatcommunity. And for the family, it was something -- they went on, they dideverything they needed to do, of course, for his son and his widow. It was very 57:00terrible but -- for everybody. But my parents, as soon as they had the means,they established a fund here in his name. So, there was a Nathan IgelfeldFoundation, which -- where we sponsor an event, usually during Jewish BookMonth. And yeah, so they tried to go on. But, I mean, he did everything, but Ithink some of the zing went out of it after his brother passed. So, my fatherwas the youngest one, but he was the organizer of the family. And I've alwaysfelt that this library was a second home to me. And I have, though, in my mind,though, when I try to remember certain events of the -- especially the early'50s, when I was still a kid, I can't tell you where -- whether certain thingshappened at the library or at the Workmen's Circle. The library built abeautiful, beautiful building in the old neighborhood in Mile End on the cornerof Esplanade and Mount Royal. But they built it just before the beginning of the 58:00movement of the community going west. So, the building, it didn't have that longa life. It was absolutely beautiful. When I try to think of the people thatbuilt it and the kind of amkha [Hebrew: common folk], the grassroots fundraisingthat went on and the kind of -- this was not fancy people that built thatbuilding. It was not the uptown crowd. And it was just beautiful. It hadbeautiful reading rooms with wood paneling and had an auditorium and it hadoffices and it had stacks -- it was just gorgeous. But even before that, therewas -- the library was just a few blocks down and it was just a wonderful placeto be. And Dora Wasserman, who used to have her children's group there and therewere -- a lot of things went on there. And half a block away was the Y, with theYM-YWHA, the Jewish community center where I went. So, it was that whole area.And, of course, we should have bought up all the real estate instead of leaving 59:00the area because now it's just one of the trendiest areas in town, of course.But who knew? So, yeah, but that was where we lived. So, I went to yidishefolkshule, which was about a block -- which is now -- that building is now ownedby a French -- a Collège Français [French-language secondary school] that were-- other Jewish schools in the area, all the institutions, everything was inthat area, what's now called Mile End. That's where I grew up. It wasn't calledMile End when we lived there. It was called -- it was an immigrant neighborhood.So, it's very ironic that some of the children or grandchildren of the peoplewho did their very, very best to leave that area went back. But, yeah, then --so folkshule, I still think, was the only school where I really ever learnedanything important. And at the time when I finished elementary school, at thetime it was still -- elementary school was seven years and high school four. 60:00There was no middle school. There was no junior high or anything like that. Now,it's six years elementary and five high school here, 'cause we're still the only-- I think we're the only province in Canada that has eleven years before youfinish high school. And other places, it was twelve, right? And I think in theStates it's twelve. And in Ontario, for a long time, it was -- they had gradethirteen, which was crazy, which they got rid of a few years ago. But so,elementary school, which ended in seventh grade, I went to a yidishe folkshuleand then there was no Bialik High School yet, which now exists. So, I went offto a Protestant school board high school, which I hated. But folkshule wasgreat. But I went to mitlshule [high school]. There were -- mitlshule in theafternoons, after -- and then there was something called "hekhere kursn[advanced courses]," which was past mitlshule. But yeah, so -- and then, I went 61:00to Camp Hemshekh, which was another salvation, which I think you've probablyheard about, which was the Yiddish -- the camp that the Bund started in theCatskills in 1959. And again, it's remarkable. Here were these people who'dbarely come to America ten years before, most of them, making a camp for theirchildren because they wanted them to have this experience. And I think they weretrying to recreate something they couldn't recreate anymore, which was thoseBund camps of the '30s. But still, we went, it was a great, great experience fora lot of us and a lot of people went there and made friendships that continuedforever. But it also allowed us to be in a Jewish secular environment, notZionist, but a lot of the kids were, of course, children of survivors beforethat was a term, before anyone knew what it meant. It wasn't an issue, a topicyet. But just to be with each other in a way without having to talk about it, to 62:00just know that somehow we were connected in a lot of different ways -- and itwas very, very good. It was funny, it was fun. We didn't sit around with longfaces, but it was this very, very strong connection. So, yeah. I don't know whatelse you want to know. About the library?
JK:Do you remember any Yiddish writers as a child or a young adult?
RA:Well, yeah, I can't even tell -- some of them are stories I heard -- I mean,
I remember there were people who were friends of my parents. I remember ShmerkeKaczerginski who came here, who I think is one of your areas of interest, but hewas a friend of my parents. He was a really lively guy. He was a lot of fun. Idon't think his talk that he gave was so fun, but he was a wonderful guy. Hesang, he -- a poet. And so, I remember him vaguely, but I remember he was very 63:00-- yeah, because when he died -- he died in 1952, right? I was six years old.How much can I -- some people have these vivid memories of stuff, but I don't.And then, all these writers who came and -- Grade was here, Bashevis Singer.Before he was Bashevis Singer, he was Itskhok Bashevis. And he came and talked-- but I remember him coming to the Workmen's Circle, the Arbeter Ring. TheArbeter Ring also had a building on Saint Laurent Boulevard, now called TheMain, which is now -- that building is now a very popular concert venue calledthe Sala Rosa, which does all kinds of concerts. And downstairs, there's aSpanish restaurant and upstairs is the Sala Rosa. But the Sala Rosa was where Ispent -- that whole building, spent many, many years of my child-- days andevenings there of my childhood. And that auditorium is where we heard a lot ofdifferent speakers. Again, one of my father's stories about Bashevis is when he 64:00came and he gave this big talk, world politics and da-da-da. And then, in thosedays, they had a lot of stamina, so they would sit there for two hours or three-- and apparently, at a quarter to midnight or something, when he was windingup, in the question period, one guy says to him, "Khaver bashevis, khaverbashevis, hob nokh ayn klayne frage: Vos iz di tsukunft fun yidishe folk? [Mr.Bashevis, Mr. Bashevis, I have one more little question: What is the future ofthe Jewish people?]" "What's the future of the Jewish people," that was hislittle question. So, that was -- (laughs) I love that story. (laughter) So, thatwas the atmosphere, right? And I don't know what he said in answer, but it's agreat question. And Manger came and -- a lot of these authors had feuds witheach other. Avrom Reyzen came. Grade came until his wife no longer allowed himto come because she was jealous. There were people here that she thought were --she was a very -- I mean, it's all been documented now. So, here's Montreal, one 65:00of the premiere cities for a Yiddish writer to come to and after a certainperiod, she was jealous of Chava Rosenfarb and she was jealous of IreneKupferschmidt, who's Rokhl Korn's daughter. And who else was she jealous of? Idon't know. Well, she once famously slapped Chava Rosenfarb in New York, so thestory goes. I wasn't there. But so, who else came in? And there were just a lotof -- Karpinowitz came, and then you can read about -- what's his name? SholemShtern, in his memoirs, is always complaining that the library didn't invite hisauthors 'cause they were communists. The library was really neutral ground for alot of people because you had such -- the very, I would say, really very pitched 66:00battles, also, between communists and socialists and Zionists. The library wasneutral territory. The library was where people had to park their politics. Imean, they knew who each other were but it was not a political place, it wasn'ta political party, and they tried to avoid events that were too political. Notthat they -- but Shtern is always complaining in his memoir that his authorsdon't get invited because there's prejudice, blah blah blah. Maybe, I don'tknow. But then, you had, really, a remarkable group of Yiddish writers who livedhere: Meylekh Ravitch, who came here, and Rokhl Korn, who, I think still, one ofthe best poets and who didn't get her due. She didn't get translated the way sheshould have been early enough. She's a wonderful poet. And Chava Rosenfarb andYud Yud Segal, of course, and some lesser -- and Ida Maze, who I think is -- 67:00whose children's poetry needs to be resurrected, I think. And her adult poetryis -- it's okay. It's fine. But she was like the mother of all the writers. Andagain, one of the famous stories about her, which I don't know if it's true ornot, but was told to me by somebody who claims to have been there -- was talkingabout some writer. She said, "Oy, der yid hot dokh nisht kayn brekl talent. Mirmuzn helfn aroysgevn zayn bukh," meaning "This man has no talent. We have tohelp him publish his book," right? So, (laughs) now, if it's not true, it couldhave been true. That's the kind of thing -- it was like her. But she really tookcare of a lot of people (UNCLEAR), but her children's poetry is wonderful and Ithink it needs to be kind of picked -- and Yud Yud Segal's children's poetry iswonderful. Much more interesting than a lot of his -- I mean, he has some reallygood, potent stuff but I think some people, once they started to be able topublish and because there were no publishers, they published whatever they 68:00wanted in those -- they published too much at some point. And I've always felt,and it's not an original idea of mine, that one of the tragedies of the post-warperiod for Yiddish is that there were no more editors, right? And that everywriter, even the best Nobel Prize-winning writer needs an editor. They needsomebody they have to listen to. Now, not every editor's always right but Ithink many editors are. And editors are there to rein in kind of your ego and torein in people once they've put something on paper, they can't -- now, somewriters are very rigorous and they will be their own best editors. But otherscan't. So, if you have no editors and no real publishing houses, you publish --you have a komitet [committee], and the komitet's job is not to give you anyliterary criticism. It's to raise money so you can publish your book, and that'swhat all these bikher-komitetn [literary committees] were about. They publishedbooks and they did -- and some of the people who were on these komitetn had 69:00taste, but they couldn't tell the writer what to write, so they helped them putout these books. And ironically, a lot of the books have beautifulillustrations. Some of the best illustrators illustrated them, these books, andsome of the books are not the world's greatest poetry. And some of thempublished a lot of books. But Ida Maze, I think, did some beautiful children'sstuff. She has her adult stuff, too. And Segal, if you go look at the children'sstuff, it's such a different tone than the other stuff. And then, there was --and then what's his name? Mordkhe Hosid, who was one of my teachers, who was avery interesting poet but very dense, very difficult to penetrate, and verydark. And he didn't start publishing his stuff for a very long time 'cause hekept everything in a drawer. But he was very, very -- what's the word? Worked onhis stuff. He didn't publish that much. Peretz Miransky, who was in Toronto, washere originally and then went off to Toronto. So, there was a whole group of 70:00these writers and some of it stands up and some of it less so. But it was a veryinteresting place to be. And there was a lot of activity. Yeah, I remember oneyear, I was very -- in the J.I. Segal Prize world, 'cause every --- it used tobe every year and for the last while, it's been every two years. When it came toYiddish literature, there was a year where there were -- it was very difficultto get a jury together that was gonna do an objective appraisal of severalpeople's works -- were all up for a prize in the same year. Who do you find thatcan be objective? And there were some years where they had to ship it to akomitet somewhere else because -- and then people got offended and if theydidn't get the prize, "Why me? Why not him or her" -- sorry, "Why him, why notme?" But because also they didn't have a wider outlet, I think it all got very 71:00intense. Some writers got discovered much later, got translated much later on.But for all of those years, they were sort of in that world. Some of them werereally very fine writers and might have been better with good editors. There wasthis one guy, Chaim Leib Fuks, who actually -- yeah, the poet -- but hepublished this lexicon. I mean, he did an incredible amount of work. He came upfrom New York at one point. He was originally -- and his sons were in camp withme. But he came up from New York and ended up living here. And he did a thing of-- a leksikon af kanade yidishe shrayber [lexicon of Canadian Jewish writers],so he has -- it's a compendium just of all Canadian Yiddish writers in alldifferent fields. And then, Pierre Anctil, who's a very fine translator ofYiddish to French here in Montreal, he's done a lot of translations from Yiddishto French. He compiled that. But I remember Chaim Leib, who was a character, who 72:00was like one of these larger than life characters. And he, I remember, heaccosted me one day and he said, "Rivkele [little Rebecca]" -- he was fromŁódź, can you tell? "Efsher vestu iberzetst a mol a pur lider [Maybe youcould translate a couple of poems sometime]?" He said, "Kane shrabt dokh azelkhelider [No one writes these kinds of poems]." Yeah, and if you looked at hisstuff, you'll see it's very wide across the page. If the page had been wider,his lines would have been longer. But he just thought -- he said, "Yeydes vortiz dokh gold, gold [Every word is gold, gold]." And he said that to me. So,that's what he thought. So, that's not -- maybe it could be true but you're notthe most objective judge of your own work. You need somebody else to say,"Yeydes vort iz gold." But you get your komitet and then you publish your book.But he was a real character. But that book that he put together of thecompendium of all these writers was a real contribution to -- because I don't 73:00think it would be so easy now to do it. So, they were fun, but -- and that's it.So, I've been involved in this library ever since I can remember. I've beendoing Yiddish poetry readings ever since I can remember and I have to thank mymother, my uncle for being the coaches. I think the first thing I can rememberdoing is standing on a chair, and it must have been about four or five, andreciting Kadia Molodowsky's -- that poem, which I love -- I still think she'sone of the best ever children's poetry writers -- "Olke mit a bloye parasolke[Olga and her little blue parasol]." So, I'm standing on a chair going, "Hintervarshe, ek okhote, a hoyf mit blote [Outside of Warsaw, hidden away, there was amuddy courtyard]," which is -- and stuff like that. And then, far too manyHolocaust remembrance things of far too many landsmanshaftn at some point. Atone point, there was the Fishman sisters, Raizel and Anna, or now Raizel Candib 74:00and Anna Gonshor. And there was somebody else -- myself, and we -- there was oneyear -- I can't remember how many different events we did. The Vilna, theVarsheve, the Kovno, the Bund one. And we made a terrible joke and we decided tocall ourselves the "klog sisters," the wailing sisters. But my uncle and mymother were very, very instrumental in helping us. And then, I've been involvedhere, either as a member of the board or the Yiddish Committee and now I'm veryinvolved with the library in a number of different areas. I'm a vice presidentof the library -- of the board. We're going through a big transition now becausewe have a new director who's great. And so, it's like a new era and we're comingup on the hundredth. And now, we've got you guys from the National Yiddish BookCenter who are coming to give a new life to all our material. 75:00
JK:I was wondering about your work with refugees and --
RA:Yeah.
JK:-- immigrants.
RA:Yeah.
JK:Do you think that your own background being a refugee as a child played a
role in --
RA:I think it played a role in my sticking with it. It didn't consciously play a
role in my starting. Maybe it was there because the way it all happened was thatwhen I was in my early -- I'm very -- I always tell students that I'm a very badexample 'cause I never finished anything. I quit school. I never got my BA atMcGill, and then I went off and did this and that and the other thing. And then,I eventually -- I guess I was -- in 1974, so I was twenty-six or something likethat. I had met the then director of Jewish Immigrant Aid Services, Joseph Cage, 76:00in another way 'cause he also was very involved in all things in the community.He was very involved in Congress. He was one of the instigators of what was thefirst national -- the Yiddish Conference in '69 and he had -- and he wasinvolved in Labor Zionist stuff and he was one of the people who got the J.I.Seg-- he was involved in a million things. He was Mr. Network and Mr. -- and so,I knew him and, in fact, at one point, I had taught his sons Yiddish a littlebit at home, much to their chagrin, 'cause even though he was such a Yiddishist,he sent his children off to Adath Israel. He was a Labor Zionist and he was aYiddishist and he sent them to Adath Israel, which was very Hebrew and veryreligious. So, he decided they needed to learn some Yiddish. So, the poor kids-- four boys who -- pent up in school had to endure having Yiddish lessons withme. So, I knew him from these Yiddish things, right? And I knew him because 77:00before I started working with refugees, I had briefly worked -- in '71, I guessit was, there was a national -- after this big Yiddish Conference, they createdthe National Committee on Yiddish at Canadian Jewish Congress. And it was veryfunny because they hired what was called the national secretary, was a part-timeposition, which they gave to a man, a very lovely man called Abraham Shurim --but who had just retired as being the executive director of Histadrut. So, thiswas his retirement job. And me, his assistant, worked full time. (laughs) So, myboss was there half the day and I was there the whole day in the Canadian JewishCongress Building, which -- of course, the Canadian Jewish Congress no longerexists but at the time, the building had just, just opened, that beautifulbuilding, the -- where the Congress archives are now on the corner of WilderPenfield and Côte-des-Neiges. Anyway, so there we were, and it was all new, we 78:00were all being created, and my Yiddish was actually better than his. So, Iworked at that job and Dr. Cage, Dr. Joseph Cage, along with a whole bunch ofpeople who also were involved here at the library were my board, my komitet, soto speak. So, I had to deal with all of them. And so, I got to know Dr. Cageduring that time in a different way. And so, then fast forward a little whilelater, when I decided I needed to get a serious job -- I left that job for allkinds of reasons. And I went to see him, not to ask him for a job but to ask himif he knew if there were any jobs in the community. It was more like a -- itwasn't a job interview. And I guess he liked me. I mean, I'm not -- it's hard tosay, but he really liked me. I was very fortunate or unfortunate as the case may 79:00be because I never had a proper job interview. I never had to establish that Ihad any knowledge or credentials. I sort of -- so, he hired me initially becausehe had a grant -- so, this was in the spring of '74. He had a grant to dolanguage courses for immigrants, so he hires me to do this. I have zerocompetence in this. I have no piece of -- so, I invented it all. I made it up. Ifigured out how to make the -- I did what the classes -- but what I had a chanceto do was meet the clients of the agency. I went to see all the workers, thesocial workers, new immigrants, and figured it out and ran these mostly Englishclasses, at the time, before French became de rigueur. And for one group,French, and then for -- anyway, so I had elderly and I had Russians, I hadMoroccans, I had all these things. But I got to know a lot of people in a niceway because I was the teacher and they were the students. And so, later on, he 80:00rehired me after that summer to do housing because there was a big housingcrunch in Montreal and we had a lot of big families coming. And then, in the --sorry, the winter of '75, when one of the social workers went on maternityleave, I took over her caseload with five minutes, literally five minutespreparation. But by then, I had already been wandering around the agency. I knewpeople. I had a sense of what was going on. So, I practiced on my clients. Imade a lot of mistakes. I had no social work background and he used to -- Dr.Cage used to alternately say, "Thank God you're not a social worker," and therest of the time was trying to persuade me to go back to school to get a pieceof paper. And it was more like to protect me, 'cause I had no degree inanything. And to his credit, he was mostly hiring people with degrees. We wereway ahead of the game there. Everyone had either a bachelor in social work or 81:00anthropology or something. Everyone had a degree except me. So, eventually, acouple years later, he moved me over into -- more on the immigration side. Andso, I really learned -- and it was right around that time that the law hadchanged, also, and there was -- and immigration at the time, who was still ourfriend, was -- put on a lot of workshops for people, for -- and they had, at thetime, decided that they wanted people in the non-governmental organization, whatyou would call the voluntary sector, to really understand all this stuff. Andthey put on all these training workshops for us. And very early, I becameinvolved -- again, Dr. Cage, he was really a network guy. He was way ahead ofhis time. So, he was one of the founders in the '70s, for all kinds of reasons,of what then became what's now the Canadian Council for Refugees. At the time, 82:00it had another name. And he was involved with the Ethnic Press Federation. Hewas involved with the Citizenship Council and he was involved with all kinds ofstuff outside the community when it came to immigration and refugees. And he wasa very respected voice in the outside world. And everyone envied us. Everyone inthe non-Jewish world envied us our Jewish Immigrant Aid Services. The onlypeople who didn't understand too much what we were doing were people in thecommunity. So, I used to tell my coworkers if you want to talk to people whoknow what you're doing, you have to go outside the community. And here, we'd getpeople saying, There are still Jewish immigrants coming to Canada? And outside,they'd say, Oh, JIAS! We want a JIAS! We want this, we want that. And, ofcourse, there was always the tension between where should people be going -- so,people who were sitting here, who had come to Canada, were -- always had ideasfor other people -- should go. I'm being very -- and kind of very -- 'cause Ilived through this period where it was very difficult because people would sit 83:00and say, Why don't they go to Israel? But they weren't in Israel. They werehere. I have no problem with people going to Israel, but if people who aresitting in Canada and who chose to come to Canada -- because a lot of thesepeople who were saying this had come here from countries that were much closerto Israel than to Canada. And from here, they're sitting and really criticizingother people who are not going to Israel. It was a very rough period, especiallyin the -- with a lot of the Moroccans who came. And there was an attitude aboutthem and why were they coming here and not there. And then, with the Russians,of course, it was huge in the '80s. There was huge, huge, huge pressure forpeople to -- but so I lived through all that and through -- during the '80s,there was a very big development of the whole sector of immigration and refugeeprotection groups and immigration groups. And so, I've been part of that wholenetwork. And in 1979, also working at JIAS, when the Southeast Asian -- when the 84:00Vietnamese boat people movement started, which I think the US was also very,very involved in that and a very political atmosphere of -- at the time, hereare all these people in boats but we -- it was clear why we should help them. Itwas a very Cold War kind of atmosphere. And I'm not saying they should've beenhelped. But today, we have boat people, and everyone thinks we should send themanywhere except here. So, it's all context. So, in '79, when the boat peoplemovement really started, in Montreal we started also a coalition oforganizations that were working on that issue and then branched out to work onimmigration and refugees more generally. And I was, again, as a JIAS delegate, Iwas one of the founders of that and then became, a few years later, the chair ofthe board of that organization. I was the chair for about twenty years. It was 85:00far too long. But now I'm still very involved with the Canadian Council ofRefugees and I do -- haven't done very much lately, but what I was doing as afreelancer -- when I left JIAS -- I left in 1991 after seventeen years and thejoke is that when I started, I started in 1974, I told myself that to prove thatI'm a serious person, I had to stay for two years unless they fired -- I said tomyself, Unless they fire you, you have to stay. Whether you hate it or you loveit, you have to stay. So, seventeen years later and a whole lifetime later, Ileft and became a freelancer doing training, freelance training for peopleworking in the field. And so, I've stayed very involved in this whole thing. So,in Montreal, I was -- that's what I do. But back to your question, I think whenI started, I didn't think of it like that. I was just looking for a job. But Ithink that I found my calling. And yes, and then I made the links. So, I didn't 86:00get involved in this because of my background but I think my background gave mean appreciation of why these issues were important and how to take them forward.But I also met so many people from so many different backgrounds that were veryinvolved in this and very passionate about it from totally other backgrounds.And I looked and I sort of looked at how different people come to the same thingand what it means. And the way I grew up, very not religious, very secular, andI didn't know any Catholics when I grew up. They were like these strange peopleand the Catholic Church here in Quebec was not, at the time, the mostprogressive institution. However, when I started doing immigration and refugeework and met the real social justice church crowd who are so committed and soprogressive and so everything, I said, Wow, this is a whole other -- thechurches were very, very involved in the refugee sponsorship and refugeeresettlement and fighting for refugee rights. And so, it was a revelation. I 87:00made some wonderful, wonderful colleagues and friends from -- out of that wholenetwork. Not the very conservative evangelical crowd, but the people who werereally the small C social justice Christians in that sense. So, I have this hugenetwork of people that I know and it's great. So, I come to it with that and Itried to bring in that sensibility and the things I learned from watching myparents and their circle and seeing what's relevant and what's not and kind ofseeing how people forget. People forget and if you look at that -- the group ofpeople, I think that you would say some of the people like my parents and theircrowd who, at the time, had to fight -- who had to be allowed into Canadabecause they were Jews and that that was -- it took a while for Canada to admitJews. But right now, my parents, as former partisans, would be very suspect and 88:00it has nothing to do with being Jewish. But it would be because they were whatis now called irregular combatants. Irregular combatants are not very welcome inmost Western countries. And there's a great difficulty that people have making adistinction between people who, in very abnormal circumstances, do things thatare outside their (makes air quotes) normal -- right? And, it's like the poem,"Roms drukeray [The Rom printing press]," Sutzkever's poem, which sums it up.You take people who were people who were reading books and took the lead fromthe typeset and made bullets. But that wasn't their idea of a good time. So, howdo you distinguish between people like that and people who are quote-unquoteterrorists because that's what they do in their life. It's very hard for a lotof governments to make that distinction now. So, when I look at the way somepeople are judged now, I say, Oh, gee, my parents wouldn't have been admitted 89:00into Canada because they were irregular combatants. They weren't in an army,they weren't wearing a uniform. And people like my parents are now being accusedof war crimes in Lithuania. So, what do you do with that? My mother's closefriend is on a list. But when you look at that -- and people say, Oh, it's notthe same thing. I said, "Well, yeah, it is the same thing. It's the same thing."So, I guess I pull my inspiration from that and then I tried to look at what'sgoing on now. It's foreign -- people will say, Oh, it's much more complicatednow. Yeah, it is. It is and it isn't. It's complicated for a lot of differentreasons but it's also not in the sense that some people are the ones who arebeing hit on the head and other people are the ones who are letting it happen.
JK:Yeah.
RA:Anyway, so, yeah, it's -- I do pull it from there. But I think it's become
much more than that, yeah. On the other hand, there were times -- I remember 90:00once being in a situation where I realized you can also be dismissed because ofthat background, because I remember going years ago on -- forget which piece oflegislation, going to a Senate committee hearing on a particular piece oflegislation. Now, I was there with three other colleagues. We were all therewith our organizational hats, I don't -- and we presented our presentations onthis legislation and then, as we were leaving and the senators had already left,there was a piece of paper lying on one of the desks. And I was taught by one ofmy journalist friends that anything that somebody leaves on top of the desk atthe end of the day and walks away, you -- is fair game. But the trick is youdon't pick it up and start reading it there. You just pick it up and keep goinglike you're supposed to have it. So, I take this paper and off I go and then Ilooked at it. And what it was was short notes about each of the presenters, 91:00right? So, with the others, there were notes about what organizations they hadbeen involved in and this -- and then some of it was very political 'cause itwas so-and-so who used to belong to this party or the other party. Had nothingto do with the organization they represented, right? And "Rivka Augenfeld is achild of Holocaust survivors." That's what it said. So, even though I was notthere for -- I was there for a very big coalition of organizations. But it waslike to say -- how I read it, and I think I'm right, is, "Oh, she's sincere butshe's very emotional on this issue." It's not like, "I have nothing" -- it'sjust my background. But there's nothing that one needs to really take accountof. So, it works both ways. But you also have to be careful. You have to thinkthrough what you're doing and you have to know what you're talking about and youhave to have a rational position. And despite that, right now we're living 92:00through tough times because the present minister of immigration decides torespond by just every time somebody criticizes him, he throws out anotherinsult. So, that's where I am right now, trying to remain calm. But I think it'sall connected. It's all connected and I think that the Jewish community has toremember where it comes from and whose side it needs to be on. And there isn'tthat -- the "St. Louis," which was the boat that got turned away at the EastCoast in 1939 and other boats that are coming today, there are more similaritiesthan people want to think about.