Keywords:American citizenship; Americanization; family background; hat business; immigration; millinery; Opatov; Opatow; Opatów, Poland; Russia; U.S.; U.S. Army; United States; United States Army; US; US Army
CHRISTA WHITNEY:This is Christa Whitney and today is May 26th, 2017. I am here
with Benjamin "Ben" Corin. Going to record an interview as part of the YiddishBook Center's Wexler Oral History Project. Do I have your permission to record?
BENJAMIN CORIN:Absolutely.
CW:Great. Well, just some basics: so, where is your family from?
BC:Poland, to the degree that I know about, because they're Jewish, of course,
and I assume that they didn't originate in Poland.
CW:And where were you born?
BC:In Poland, in Opatów, Poland.
CW:And do you come from a religious family background?
BC:Not really. I think they were -- my understanding is that every family was
more or less religious. But today, I think that every family would consider thepeople of that time as very religious.
CW:And do you know what the professions in your family were?
BC:Not really, although my mother's family, and my father's, were comfortable in
Europe. I think that the -- Lucy was a little -- did not say the fact that Ibelieve her mother's parents were more than just comfortable. They were quitewealthy. I mean, I think she did not give the extent of -- when they lived theyhad an actual compound where the entire family sort of lived in this enormous 2:00compound. And we went to visit where they lived and what they did. And, ofcourse, we had all the information about it before. It must have been, you know,very extravagant.
CW:And when did you come to the US?
BC:The background in this is that my father had run away from home. He was
approximately fourteen years old. Took the money from his bar mitzvah and tookmoney that you shouldn't, bought a ticket, and came to the United States. Mygrandfather came after him to bring him back home and my father told mygrandfather that this, meaning the United States, is the land of opportunity."This is where I'm going to live. I don't want to go back in Poland." You haveto understand the background circumstances and that was that we lived on the 3:00Russian-Polish border. So, they were Polish one year and they were Russian thenext year. But under that -- in that situation, you also had to understand thatthey were always Jewish. So, he did not like it. I inherited many aspects fromboth my parents, and one was that you sort of stick up for yourself. You do notget pushed around. You fight for your rights. And as my father picked himself upand went to the United States on his own, which today is unheard of -- andsomeone -- who would do that at age of fourteen? And with no help from anyone,he just did it and originally succeeded very well. And the way it came aboutthat I was born in Poland is after my father got out of the army, of course he 4:00became a citizen immediately and I think the army was very good for him becausehe learned American ways very fast. He became Americanized almost immediately.When he did get out of the army, he went into business, he was unbelievablysuccessful, and then went back to the Old Country where they brought out all ofthe women all of the beauties of every town. Here he is, a successfulbusinessman, industrialist, and American war hero. And he's something liketwenty-four years old or so. And he married my mother, who was a beautifulwoman, who loved Lucy unbelievably. And when they got married, I wasn't there,so I can't tell you what the conversation was. She told my father that she's notcoming back to the United States. She loved her life there, she loved her 5:00parents, she was very attached to them, and she was there. So, they stayed theremaybe eight, ten years beyond when -- after they were married. So, my oldersister was born there and I was born there. And then, I'm lucky in a way thatthey came to the United States. I did not -- who knows -- would have occurred?
CW:What was your father's business?
BC:He went into millinery, which is women's hats. And, of course, when women
wore hats -- and they all wore hats -- he was very, very successful. The timecame, like it does in every industry, there are cycles. And when they didn't, hethen had a very, very difficult time. And I would come in even to help dowhatever odd jobs that could help him at the age of twelve. So, I learned to 6:00work, all my life.
CW:What was Jewish about your home growing up?
BC:Nothing very special. I think we were very average. My father worked very
hard. It was a period of time that his business was going down and he had to doother things and, of course, remained in that facet of -- in that industry. So,he basically had to give up many things to support his family. And I rememberthat. And one of the things I wanted to say, which is, to me, basic, myfather-in-law died when I was eighty-eight and I thought, When -- eighty-eight,I'm going to then coast (laughs) in everything. But it isn't, and now, I'm olderthan that but I regret one thing with both people. And I say this all the time, 7:00this is my biggest regret, that I did not talk to my father more and that I didnot talk to my father-in-law more. They both were very wise, smart people that Icould've learned a lot more from than I did, doing the things that were -- goingdown to the block and talking to the guys. They were both wonderful people and Irespect them enormously.
CW:Do you remember when you first met your father-in-law --
BC:Yes, I did.
CW:-- Aron Alperin?
BC:(laughs) And I think he liked me immediately. You have to understand Lucy had
a lot of boyfriends, being a woman engineer with very few women. I think she wasthe only woman in the four years -- in City College, it took four,four-and-a-half, actually, if you took it at a normal pace. But Lucy was very 8:00good. She did it in three. She actually graduated a very tough engineeringschool at the age of nineteen. So, that was very incredible and I was impressedby it. So, that was a very, very nice thing. So, she had many, many boyfriends,I assume. She's told me some things about them but we're really talking about myfather-in-law. And I think he liked me and he liked the fact, and I remember it-- and he asked where I lived and I said Herzl Street. You know, "Herzl Street?"I did not know what that meant. I didn't know who Herzl really was at that time.But that, to him, and I thought afterward, This is a sign to him from God, Ithink. (laughs) He really has someone coming from Herzl Street. But Ithink both my in-laws liked me immediately. I mean, sort of outgoing at times 9:00and an introvert more times than that but they liked me. But it was Lucy, theone who had to make that decision and her parents were good. But most importantthing is that -- about my father-in-law, should I go right into that?
CW:Sure.
BC:Because that's who we really -- he was an individual who was very --
absolutely -- he never pushed himself to the forefront in anything, whereas mostpeople did. If you wanted to talk about the fact that what he did in hisprofession, he was totally, completely honest. And although he had an opinion ofpeople, if he didn't have a nice word to say about them, he said nothing. I 10:00never heard him really insult anyone. Everyone trusted him and everyone likedhim. He was unbel-- you'd use the word "tsadik [righteous person]" now. Everyoneliked him to an enormous degree. And he did -- I would come and he liked thefact that I would take him anywhere he wanted to go. So, I became a part of hislife in going -- taking him to different places. For example, the seventhLubavitcher rebbe, Menachem Mendel, Menachem would call my father-in-law andwant to see him. And we would s--
CW:How did they know each other?
BC:Well, it started off -- it's really a long-term friendship and my
father-in-law never really -- this is, these are among the things that I wish I 11:00had the opportunity to talk to him. I ended up knowing -- they were in Paris atthe same time, but my father was the editor and in the forefront of a newspaper.Menachem Mendel was a student at the Sorbonne, and not matriculated at thattime. So, I've had to do a lot of research. I've given some talks. Lucy alwaysvolunteers me to talk about -- but we're talking about --
CW:So, you would take him to visit Mendel.
BC:We would visit. Now, why would he want to see my father-in-law? Every -- a
few times a year, and they would talk for one or two hours. All his discipleswould go crazy because Menachem Mendel would see you for somewhere between threeand ten seconds. He would see three thousand people in an evening. We would sitdown and talk. And I was there, understanding when they spoke in English and 12:00then Yiddish and then French. And to make it palatable for me to understand him,he would say, "Talk to him, you know? The Lubavitcher is an engineer." But hereally wasn't. And I learned a lot about him and I could tell stories about itbut that's not what we're talking about, but -- and I had to understand, why didthe -- Menachem Mendel want to see my father? My father -- my father-in-law. Myfather-in-law knew things. When he wrote, he wrote and Lucy was not -- did notelaborate as much and, possibly, I try to bring it up. He spoke about theconditions of Jews in every area of the world. He went there, he saw, that'swhat he wrote about. He loved, as Lucy said, three things, I try to say. I heldup three fingers: his family, Jews, and Israel. That was his interest in his 13:00life. And he recorded it all. But he didn't give it anything of himself. He gavehis knowledge and his understanding of what was happening and that's what hewrote about. So, if Menachem Mendel wanted to be wise and be able to discern anddescribe what's happening anywhere in the world, he called Ashik, which is whatthey called him. His name was Aron but they really called him Ashik because mymother-in-law called him Ashik. So, we emulated that and called him Ashik. Andthere are ripples to this. For example, and I'll tell it, it's sort of funny --both my sons and I -- so, we're very close as a family and a great rapport. AndI would try to tell them, "How do you make your decisions?" And they said, You 14:00have to follow Ashik's thinking. But what is Ashik's thinking? What Ashik'sthinking is, What's good for the Jews? Now, Ashik's thinking is what's good forthe Jews, how does that relate to yourself? Because what is good for you? Howdoes it work out, when you're analyzing by a situation, going to make thedecision, what is best for you? Going back to Hillel's, "If I'm not for me, whowill be for me," et cetera, et cetera? So, that is -- all you have to do is acode word, what's good for the Jew-- you already know how you arrive and resolvea problem. So, there were many things of that aspect. But that also occurred andmy father-in-law was a great friend and would take our children, when they'revery young age, to see everyone and anyone. Then he would -- I have a tape andI'm -- keeper of things. I don't throw everything away, Lucy will tell you. 15:00Ben-Gurion, they went to Ben-Gurion's house and he was a good friend of everyonebecause they all liked him. He knew what was going on. And he would let youtake, after he told it to you and now you expounded, he'd let you take thecredit for it all and didn't try to take it back. He was just a good guy, to elaborate.
CW:So, he would visit Ben-Gurion?
BC:So, he knew everyone personally and everyone liked him from -- he introduced
us as a family, my mother-in-law, Lucy, myself, et cetera, at every -- we wentto all of the different meetings and he would always bring along -- he wasalways proud of his family and always introduced -- whether it was Moshe Dayan,whether it was Ben-Gurion, whether it was -- I'm trying to think, one person -- 16:00well, he wrote the book. He's like Chur-- the Israeli Churchill. What's his nameagain? Okay, I'll think of it as we go on, but --
CW:That's okay.
BC:-- so, and he would ghostwrite their biographies. And no one would ever know
'cause he never would take any credit. You could rely upon him totally when theyhad conversations. You'd see in "Forverts," there was a restaurant that reallywas -- it was a cafeteria where you brought up a tray and you took what youwanted, et cetera, which was just on the corner of East Broadway. And it was thebuilding next door to the "Forverts," and "The Day" -- "Tog morgn-zhurnal" --was down the street. All of the writers would go to that cafeteria and theywould discuss and/or argue, et cetera. So, they knew each other but they had 17:00different points of view. My father-in-law would never have any argument. Hewould discuss anything and he was never -- not pushy in the slightest. In fact,the other way. He went into the background. When Lucy says that he was verycompetent, very good, but (laughs) as opposed to what we have now, and I won'teven tell you the man's name, he never blew his own horn. (laughs) He didn't sayhe was good, he didn't say -- he just did his job and he did it well. Lucy alsomentioned the fact that he was with the Israeli troops in different wars. Hewent with them. He was -- when Lucy said he was in Israel, and I believe youmentioned the area, he was in Suez. But he was surrounded. He was with the 18:00Israeli troops at the Suez War. He never said he was in any situation. You wouldnot have known what he went through, ever. Modest to a point that was unreal.
CW:What was your personal relationship with him like?
BC:Not as close as it would be now because as I've gotten older, hopefully I've
gotten more wisdom and understanding. If I can reach the point of saying that Iwish I had spoken to both these people and I actually kick myself in the rearconstantly, how could I be so stupid? Because they both had so much knowledgeand so much understanding and there are questions I have which I'll never getanswered. So, my relationship with my father, I didn't establish enough of a 19:00relationship with either. I had a good relationship but not enough because theway I look at them now -- so, that's my biggest regret.
CW:And how would you describe what he wrote about?
BC:He wrote on a level that -- he was above and he wrote better than the people
who understand what he was writing. He did it at a higher level and theirknowledge, understanding, and ability to discern what he was saying was not asgood as he wrote it. I don't know whether I'm making myself clear. In otherwords, he wrote at a level that was really above them and he -- but he didn'tchange. That was his style. That was what he did. That was how he did it. Andit's amazing that he just -- you can learn things in a school but you really 20:00learn them on the job doing. And that's what he did. He learned everything onthe job, had an enormous facility for language, you have to understand. Andwe're talking -- I mentioned Lubavitcher. He did, too, because he learned Germanoriginally, and he went to school in Germany. He learned French and he did that.He, of course, spoke -- he knew Russian and represented his father, who was incharge, so I know a lot about the Lubavitcher --
CW:Lubavitcher.
BC:So, these people had great intellect that most individuals don't understand
the depth of some of the people who've gone before.
CW:What language would you speak to your father-in-law in?
BC:English. And he was totally familiar with English. I mean, total facility. I
wouldn't dare speak French in that household, because they all had great 21:00accents. And no matter what I said, I couldn't get past the first sentence.(laughs) Every word is correct and with the wrong accent.
CW:Did you ever get to read his Yiddish stuff?
BC:Yes, I did. But I'm not -- that is not a facility I'm good enough to know.
But I knew enough to know from what I heard about. My father read him and bothmy parents liked him very much.
CW:Was there anything else you want people to know about Aron Alperin, your father-in-law?
BC:Yeah, well, basically, I wanted to say that he was -- if he had been -- had a
little more ability to push himself forward, he could have been someone everyonewould have known about more. But in his time, the people that he dealt with, and 22:00this was everyone from Ben-Gurion on down, knew him and liked him to a degreethat you can't understand. I never met anyone, and I was important in myfather-in-law's life because if he needed to go anywhere, I took him. And I didit very willingly because it was always an interesting thing. I always learned alot. And I -- everyone respected him and everyone truly liked him. They trustedhim, and that was something, you -- (laughs) trust is not a situation thattravels well among men or any individuals.
CW:Great. Well, did you ever see him write?
BC:Oh, yes. He ended up -- and that's -- I remember that very, very well. He had
a very large desk and he had things very nicely -- I don't know if it's -- he 23:00did it all. My mother-in-law -- but his writing paper, the paper -- he usedpads, mostly yellow pads or white pads. And he would write on that, or he wouldtype. And I would repair his typewriters. I'm pretty mechanical. So, I wouldrepair his typewriters when I could, or I would find out where he could get itrepaired or he would tell me to look into it to see how we can get it repaired.So, that meant -- that was his life. It really was his life. It was unique.There aren't too many people who are so unbelievably dedicated. It was almostdimensional. I don't want to say one-dimensional. That was it.
CW:Did he talk to you about the importance of Yiddish to him?
BC:Not -- he never told it to you just that way. He did it in things he did,
24:00which is not usual. And most people are much more direct. They tell it to you. Ihave to admit, I'm in the group of most people. He didn't. He did it by example.He did it by asking in a different way. As I've gotten older and with wisdom,hopefully, some of it, I've learned to respect him much more.
CW:Well, I just want to thank you very much for adding your memories --
BC:Very welcome.
CW:-- about your father-in-law.
BC:I would never say it if I didn't get to that point. And this was -- you know,
being someone who is very forward-going. In other words, forthright. I don't sitback. I say what my opinion -- I'm more like my father. You get up and you do 25:00what is. And this has been my entire life, in everything I've done, and I'venever been sort of a wallflower. And you see it's very hard for me to sit -- no,you should say it this way or that way. If my father-in-law had more of that, hecould've been one of the people you read about.